Yongnuo unveil YN-622 E-TTL transceiver: Pixel King copy?

The Chinese manufacturer Yongnuo – who are best known for their YN-series speedlights and RF-series radio remotes – have just unveiled a wireless flash trigger supporting Canon E-TTL. The new product bears resemblance to the King E-TTL Trigger from rival company Pixel Enterprise, but has one or two notable differences.

The last venture into radio TTL by the Yongnuo company was the self-contained YN460-TX/RX system (a third party 600EX-RT ahead of its time?), slated by critics for its mismatched high price and low quality. The YN-622 takes a different approach.

Used with a compatible Canon EOS DSLR and EX II-series Canon or Yongnuo Speedlite(s), the YN-622C will allow you to keep your flashgun in E-TTL mode at long distances from the camera without the need for line of sight. If you prefer manual mode, you can set the precise power level and zoom of your remote flash from the back of your camera. The YN-622 also supports Multi (stroboscopic) mode. These adjustments are made possible by Canon’s Flash Control menu.

Yongnuo YN-622C E-TTL Wireless Flash Trigger Transceivers

High Speed Sync (HSS) up to 1/8000 second is supported, as is Second Curtain Sync. Ultra speed sync is possible with manual studio flashes via the Prontor/Compur (PC) sync output port. You can’t use the YN-622 as a remote shutter release.

The YN-622 has seven different frequency channels and seven combinations of wireless flash groups (A, B and C). It runs on the 2.4GHz band but it’s not clear at this stage whether it’ll be compatible with previous Yongnuo triggers such as the RF-603. The operating range is 100 metres. The device takes two AA batteries.

Yongnuo YN-622 has a metal foot and takes two AA batteries

While very similar in many ways to the Pixel King, the Yongnuo YN-622 differs as any unit can be a transmitter or receiver, instead of having to buy dedicated devices for each operation.

Yongnuo YN-622C transceiver on a Canon 60D

Apart from the transceiver format, it’s unclear – on paper – what benefits the YN-622C offers over the Pixel King.

The catalogue listing mentions support for “E-TTL group ratio (ALL/A:B/A:B C)” and “Manual/Multi Group (ALL/A:B/A:B:C)”, suggesting that multiple remote flashes could be independent from each other with distinct settings. The Kings can’t do this, but there’s a chance that it’s an error in the Yongnuo listing and the YN-622s can’t either.

Yongnuo YN-622C with a Canon Speedlite 580EX II

The Yongnuo YN-622C will be fully compatible with the Canon Speedlite 580EX II, 430EX II, 600EX, Yongnuo YN-565EX and any EOS DSLR with in-camera Flash Control menus. The transceivers will also work with other cameras and flashes but with limited abilities. The Yongnuo EX600 will not work in TTL mode with these triggers since the flash has a single-contact foot. TTL pass-through functionality is mentioned in the product listing so you should be able to have a flash on-camera while using the triggers.

If we assume the product images shown are of the final retail models, Yongnuo are likely to be criticised for not including a mini-USB port. Without it, there is no way for end-users to update the firmware. The Pixel King has a mini-USB port for firmware updates and external power.

At this stage we don’t know when the YN-622C will be released or the price range. No mention has been made of a YN-622N for Nikon i-TTL, but if one is released then it’ll have much less functionality since Nikon cameras don’t have Flash Control menus.

Yongnuo products are sold from their official eBay store with a 12 month manufacturer warranty. The competing Pixel King sells online at around US$140 for a set, available for Canon, Nikon or Sony systems.

Thanks to Juan Sanchez Castillo for the tip!

  • http://www.kandidweddings.com Ottawa Wedding Photographer

    Unless these offer ratio control or TTL pass through, I think one is better off with the Pixel Kings. At this price point it’s easy to have backup King units so the transceiver functionality of YN-622 is not enough of an upgrade in my opinion.

  • http://www.imagemelbourne.com.au Image Melbourne

    Nikons have a BETTER flash control menu than Canons, groups A B &C each have independent controls for exposure compensation and manual control. Many Nikon bodies allow using the pop up flash as a commander, Canon have oy just started doing this. It’s very handy on my D700… Canons 5D series don’t have a popup.

    Lots of speculation re the YN622s, as always users should wait for I’m depth reviews before purchase.

    • Glenn

      Canon camera’s have all those things as well body. :) Inferred is pointless outdoors and very limiting. I’m fine not having a built in flash on my 5D. Most of my shoots are outdoors and the built in flash commander is useless for 90% of my shoots. Canons also have groups A B & C independent controls for exposure compensation and manual control, and in fact had them before Nikon did. Know you facts before you start the brand wars. Pointless and stupid.

      • tony

        ^^^^agree 100%. Not to mention Canon’s latest flash has built in radio communication which gives complete wireless control and six groups all from within the camera menu.

        Canon offers popup flash which can be used as triggers in their less pro models which makes complete sense because a pro should not rely on the spotty line of site triggering anyways.

  • http://www.kandidweddings.com Ottawa Wedding Photographer

    I had a look at the product page and it indeed mentions the TTL pass-through functionality!

    “Speedlites on hot-shoe of transmitter supports ETTL”

    Could this also be an error? If this is true this would be a worthy upgrade over the Pixel King (at least on paper).

  • CotswoldPhoto

    They DO support full TTL pass thru when on the camera. They can trigger manually triggered flashes and studio strobes too, using that PC output port, just like on the RF603. And, just like on the RF603, the little 2.5mm hole at the back corner is for camera shutter triggering. The PC port is maybe an output port only as well? Like on the RF603. AS with the RF603, hand held remote triggering of flashes cannot be done, as that test button is only for a flash already mounted on the TRX, or for remote shutter release. It does not support focus or bulb modes though AFAIK (half press is missing). Wonder why the 2 batteries are not together? It is to allow two single bay battery compartments to be the same way round (allows the TRX to be shorter as the spring end is hidden) by feeding the serial wiring inside the gap between them.

    There is a single PCB inside, and it is hard wired to the bottom and top hotshoes – there isn’t room in the device height to do otherwise. That will save some money instead of making the PCB plug into the bottom shoe.

    I am not sure what YongNuo think they have achieved with this.

    • http://www.kandidweddings.com Ottawa Wedding Photographer

      Do you have access to a pre-production unit? They mention TTL ratio control in the product page. Do you know if this is true as well?

  • YN-622 Dev

    Thanks for your interest in YN-622C. I can confirm the following features are true:

    Speedlites on hot-shoe of transmitter support ettl ii/m/multi.

    ettl ii group ratio (aLL/a:b/a:b c)

    Also, 622c comes with a mixed mode. with it, you can trig remote speedlites in different modes (ettl/m/multi), though you need to set the parameters on speedlites. this mode is especially useful for those camera bodies without a built-in flash menu.

    • http://www.kandidweddings.com Ottawa Wedding Photographer

      OK, now this is definitely interesting. Is there a tentative release date? I would love to test these out.

      • YN-622 Dev

        The development has been finished. We plan to hit the market in July. Please stay tuned.

        • richard

          do these triggers work with canon 550ex flashes?

          if so i will dump my pixel kings which do not work properly with the 550ex :-(

        • Pharaoh

          Any word on the release date for the YN-622?

  • Daan

    I’m looking for a reciever for the Canon ST-E3-RT which sparks my studiolamps. Please if you know one sent me an email : info at daanooms.nl

  • Adam

    Sorry but I think the article is biased to suggest these Yongnuo’s are no better than Pixel King. Flash ratio control is a MASSIVE advantage. What Yongnuo seems to have created here is a unit that TOTALLY replicates Canon’s wireless remote system, and is totally controlled from the camera menu. It saves users the expense of upgrading to EX600-RT flashes because it enables 430s and 580s (and compatible third party units) to do everything the 600-RT can do. Bravo Yongnuo!

    • http://onegreatstud.org Boresagreat

      Only a silly person would want to buy two Canon 600EX-RT flashes just to get AF Assist Beam on camera and one wireless radio ETTL flash up to 60 feet in the real world, inside the NewYork Stock building.

      Buying this or ATG is a much better buy because it will be compatible with many EX II flashes in wireless radio ETTL in 1st, 2nd and HSS which the 600EX-RT can’t do right.

      Get this and the ATG Gold MG8K Flash or Nissin MG8000 Extreme Flash and then your sell Quantum Qflash/Trio.

  • Cedric

    Hello,
    Any update on the new flash triggers? We are now at the end of the month and I can’t find them on the official ebay store.

    Thank you,
    almo

    • http://onegreatstud.org Boresagreat

      They won’t be available in most stores until November.

      Companies are using words like “Coming soon, Available soon”.
      While dealers use, “Out of stock” when really they have none in the first place.

    • http://www.p-b-photography.co.uk Paul

      Yongnuo YN-622C now available online through eBay. Just ordered a set today and await delivery.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000674905092 David Lichodziejewski

    I would like to know if yn-622 will be able to trigger yn-565ex without receiver

    • David A. Selby

      Nope. The YN-565EX has no radio receiver built in.

  • peter

    maybe a stupid question, but does a non ttl flash i.e. yn 560ii get ttl capabilities with this device?

  • http://www.hung.be Hung

    Hi,

    Will this work on a Canon 1Dx?

    Thx

  • http://www.andyschulz.net Andy Schulz

    any news for Nikon users?

  • yoyophoto

    any news on trigering the rf 603′s with the 622′s?

    • Eugene

      I’m very interested in this too, can a RF603 triggered by a 622???

  • William

    YN-622N is coming up soon.

  • noob

    Can YN-622C trigger YN-565EX flash without it being on the YN622C itself. I can use 2 YN-565EX with 2 YN-622C and it works ok, ETTL is transmitted, but YN-565EX is supposed to be able to be slave to a Canon master flash (for e.g. cannon 580EX), would the Canon 580EX trigger it trough IR or would it talk to it trough some 2.4GHz radio? I understood that YN-622C could behave like 580EX sender and talk directly to other ETTL flashes. So the idea was – have one YN-622C on camera and mix of 580EX and YN565EX slaves. Is this possible or for each slave if I want it to receive ETTL data I have to have a YN-622C unit ? (If I understand properly with 580EX on camera I can have number of 580EX and YN565EX slaves and it will work without any additional hw) ?

Wordpress Ad Management